The key to the novel’s plot is that many in the
church knew that Jesus was married and to protect his late emerging divinity
they conspired not to let that become known, even to the point of murder. Now
as fiction, this makes an intriguing story, but what about as a historical
skeleton that lays claim to being almost quasi-non-fiction? There are three
major problems in the book we shall look at before making an observation about
the nature of our times that such a book can garner such numbers and such a response.
Three Major Problems Plus
Problem 1: Was Jesus Married? Basic to the story line is the claim that Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene and that many in the church knew (as did people like Leonardo Da Vinci later on in history). The evidence for this claim comes from two extra biblical gospels, the Gospel of Mary Magdalene 17:10–18:21 and The Gospel of Philip 63:33-36. Both contain remarks that Jesus had a special relationship to Mary or that he loved her more than any of the twelve disciples. One text uses the term “companion” to describe her. In addition, there is an appeal in the Phillip text where Jesus is said to kiss Mary on the lips. So the inference is that if he kissed her in public he must have been her husband.
Three Major Problems Plus
Problem 1: Was Jesus Married? Basic to the story line is the claim that Jesus Christ was married to Mary Magdalene and that many in the church knew (as did people like Leonardo Da Vinci later on in history). The evidence for this claim comes from two extra biblical gospels, the Gospel of Mary Magdalene 17:10–18:21 and The Gospel of Philip 63:33-36. Both contain remarks that Jesus had a special relationship to Mary or that he loved her more than any of the twelve disciples. One text uses the term “companion” to describe her. In addition, there is an appeal in the Phillip text where Jesus is said to kiss Mary on the lips. So the inference is that if he kissed her in public he must have been her husband.
The novel claims that that a married Jesus
would need to be covered up by the church because it would expose the fact that
Jesus was not divine. However, it is not a given that had Jesus been married,
this would have resulted in a question about his divinity, because the church
has always confessed the full humanity of Jesus and the status of marriage
would fit in nicely with such a claim. Thus, even the premise of the
theological problem the novel sees for a married Jesus is false.
Problem 2 The Emergence of the Gospels. The novel
also claims that the four gospels were chosen late from about eighty gospels to
be a part of the Bible because the four gospels had a divine Jesus as
opposed to other gospels that had a human Jesus. Once again we are at a place where
liberal and conservative scholars agree.
Thus, the idea that the gospels emerged as a
reflection of orthodoxy about the time of the fourth century around the time of
Constantine and the Nicean Council is just bad history. In addition, the claim
that eighty gospels were out there and that a human Jesus was present in such
works is wrong. Nothing shows this more clearly than the Gospel of Thomas77.
This saying from the most significant of the extra-biblical gospels has Jesus
confess that he is the All. Jesus goes on to say that if you look under a stone
Jesus is there and if you split a piece of wood he is there. This is an
omnipresent Jesus, a reflection of high christology in a work that
Brown claims teaches about a human Jesus.
Problem 3: Did A Belief in Jesus’ Divinity Receive
its Decisive Sanction through a “close vote” at Nicea in AD 325? This claim by
Brown is probably the worst of the three problems. What we know about Nicea is
this. It gathered not to determine the divinity of Jesus but to discuss the
Arian view of Jesus, who saw Jesus as Son of God, but appointed to that role
versus the view that the council adopted that Jesus possessed Sonship from
eternity. So the debate was the type of Son of God Jesus was, not whether Jesus
was divine. Arius believed that Jesus was Son as the first created being with a
special, unique relationship to God. What Nicea ended up affirming is that
Jesus was eternally the Son and was not created.
|
Da Vinci Code says...
“[A]ny gospels that described earthly aspects of
Jesus’ life had to be omitted from the Bible” (p. 244).
|
The Bible Says...
The gospels in our New Testament present many
“earthly aspects” of Christ’s life such as his physical frailties (hunger,
fatigue, death); emotions (anguish, outrage, love); and relational
interactions (with his mother, friends, and followers). *
|
Comments
Post a Comment